| MOFCOM Spokesman talks on US rule over coated paper |
| 2007-10-23 11:03 |
| From:MOFCOM Article type:Original |
On October 18, US Department of Commerce announced the final rule over the first anti-dumping, anti-subsidy case against Chinese coated paper, confirming different degrees of subsidizing practices in the Chinese enterprises concerned. China firmly objected to such a move. China reiterated that US decided not to apply countervailing duties to “non-market economies” since 1984 and still kept to the ruling. The decision on Chinese coated paper had obviously violated US law and the common practice of US Department of Commerce. The frequent anti-dumping and anti-subsidy investigations on Chinese imports recently had caused significant tension in China-US trade relations. In the countervailing case, a series of wrong decisions on the part of US in defining subsidized items, calculating subsidizing degrees, and the resultant problem of double remedy, had harmed the interest and feeling of Chinese enterprises. Chinese government and industry would not accept such a move. China would closely examine the final rulings, and resort to WTO settlement mechanism and other legal means to defend its own lawful interest. |
| (Source: English Site of Department of Information Technology) |
 | MOFCOM Spokesman talks on WTO probe into illegal subsidy dispute 2007-09-05 13:20 |
| MOFCOM Spokesman talks on Argentina restrictions on Chinese exports 2007-08-29 08:03 |
| MOFCOM Spokesman "regrets" US filing IPR Complaints against China to WTO 2007-08-20 08:58 |
All articles marked with "Article type: Original" posted on the website of the Ministry of Commerce and its sub-sites are copyrighted by this Website and its sub-sites. Any reproduction or use by any other websites, media or individuals must be attached with a clear indication of "Source: Ministry of Commerce Website".
All articles posted on this website or its sub-sites marked with "Article type: reproduced" or "Article type: translated" and "Article type: redistributed" come from other media, and are provided solely for the user's information, which does not mean this Website or its sub-sites endorse the ideas thereof or assume any legal liability or responsibility for their authenticity. Any other media, websites or individuals must maintain the source of information indication on this Website or its sub-sites when using the information, and shall assume legal liability for the use.
