| Chinese firm wins patent lawsuit against Schneider |
| 2007-09-30 05:41 |
| From:Xinhua Article type:Reproduced |
WENZHOU -- A Chinese low-voltage product company won a patent infringement lawsuit against France's Schneider Electric and its Chinese sales agent on Saturday, which involves 330 million yuan in compensation. A court in east China's Zhejiang Province ordered that the Tianjin-based joint venture, in which Schneider holds 75 percent of stakes, and its authorized distributor Leqing Branch of Star Electric Equipment Co. Ltd. in Zhejiang, stop selling five models of products that are based on the technology owned by Chint Group,China's leading manufacturer of low-voltage electric apparatus. In addition, the world's leading electric equipment maker should pay 334.8 million yuan (4.3 million U.S. dollars) in ten days to compensate Chint's economic losses due to the unauthorized production and sales of the apparatus, according to the verdict handed down by Wenzhou Intermediate People's court on Saturday. Court investigations show that Schneider earned 883.6 million yuan (117 million U.S. dollars) by selling the five models of apparatus, which fell in the protected scope of Chint's patent right, from August 2004 to July 2006 and made a profit of 334.8 million yuan. Chint filed the lawsuit against Schneider in August last year. The amount of compensation is believed to be the highest in China so far in terms of intellectual property disputes. The State Intellectual Property Office granted Chint with the patent of a utility model "a miniature circuit breaker" in 1999, which was used by Schneider in the manufacturing of C65a, C65N, C65H, C65L and EA9AN products. Before the court ruling, the State Intellectual Property Office had refuted Schneider's application of invalidating the patented technology, which is "a crucial step for Chint that confirms the legal foundation of the case," said Xu Zhiwu, Chint's legal representative. Schneider's attorney Ding Chen said the company will possibly file a lawsuit against the verdict to the supreme court. He noted that Schneider had sued for the validity of the disputed technology to Beijing No.1 Intermediate People's Court. The court opened a trial on Monday and the final ruling is yet to be made. The two rivals have been accusing each other over patent infringement since 1999, which indicates fierce market competition. Chint, growing from a small workshop with only 50,000 yuan as initial investment to a competitive manufacturer of low-voltage electric apparatus in the world market, has been trying to expand business to Germany, Italy, France and some other countries once dominated by Schneider. Suing business rivals for patent infringement is a common resort that some transnational companies use to elbow out competitors and dominate the market, said Nan Cunhui, board chairman of Chint. Nan attributed the fast growth of his company to technological innovation and intellectual property protection endeavors over the past 23 years. He said wining the case against Schneider will help boost the confidence of Chinese enterprises, encourage them to pursue renovation and pay more attention to intellectual property protection. |
| (Source: English Site of Department of Information Technology) |
 | Ninth meeting of China-Indonesia Economic Joint Committee held in Shangha 2007-09-30 08:25 |
| China's external debts reach $327.8 bln by June 2007-09-30 05:39 |
| President Hu underscores opening-up, economic security 2007-09-30 05:36 |
| Five companies found guilty of illegal securities trading 2007-09-29 11:14 |
| China's state forex investment company debuts 2007-09-29 11:14 |
| China Oilfield Services up 160% in Shanghai debut 2007-09-29 11:11 |
| Top U.S. firms urge Congress to snub protectionist bill 2007-09-29 10:13 |
| CPC sums up work vowing to promote economic reform, energy efficiency 2007-09-29 05:58 |
| First privately-funded Chinese railway begins operation 2007-09-29 05:52 |
| Construction begins on Tibet's biggest logistics center 2007-09-29 05:50 |
All articles marked with "Article type: Original" posted on the website of the Ministry of Commerce and its sub-sites are copyrighted by this Website and its sub-sites. Any reproduction or use by any other websites, media or individuals must be attached with a clear indication of "Source: Ministry of Commerce Website".
All articles posted on this website or its sub-sites marked with "Article type: reproduced" or "Article type: translated" and "Article type: redistributed" come from other media, and are provided solely for the user's information, which does not mean this Website or its sub-sites endorse the ideas thereof or assume any legal liability or responsibility for their authenticity. Any other media, websites or individuals must maintain the source of information indication on this Website or its sub-sites when using the information, and shall assume legal liability for the use.
